Choosing a CPA Firm for Your Audit: How to Read a Peer Review Report

Choosing a CPA Firm for Your Audit: How to Read a Peer Review Report

Looking for a CPA firm to perform an audit for your Public Housing Authority? As part of the request for proposal process, you can request a copy of a CPA firm’s most recent peer review report. It’s important to know how to read these reports so that you can be sure you’re hiring the best firm for the job. Here are the basics.

About Peer Reviews

The AICPA (American Institute of CPAs) requires every member CPA firm that performs audits, reviews, or compilations to undergo a peer review every three years. A peer review is an independent, external review of a CPA firm’s accounting and auditing practice that assesses a firm’s quality control system and adherence to professional standards.

Firms can receive one of three ratings: (1) pass, (2) pass with deficiencies, or (3) fail. Any firm that receives a rating other than “pass” is required to undergo a process called remediation, a point-by-point plan to correct any deficiencies identified during the review.

There are two types of peer reviews: system reviews and engagement reviews.

System reviews: A reviewer evaluates all elements of the CPA firm’s quality control system for performing accounting and auditing work, including a sample of the firm’s engagements. System reviews are required for member firms that perform audits, Yellow Book work (Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards), or attestation services.

Engagement reviews: A reviewer evaluates a sample of the firm’s accounting work. Engagement reviews are conducted for firms that do not perform audits, but perform other accounting work, such as reviews and compilations.

Why are Peer Reviews Necessary?

Since financial statements are often used to make important management decisions, audits and accounting work must adhere to strict professional standards. Peer reviews ensure that CPA firms are operating within these professional standards. If deficiencies are identified, the remediation process holds CPA firms responsible for correcting these deficiencies. Peer reviews also increase public transparency, with many peer review reports publicly accessible on the AICPA’s Peer Review Public File Search.

How to Read a Peer Review Report

Any firm you are considering hiring for an audit should have a system review report. As mentioned above, a firm can receive one of three ratings on its peer review: “pass”, “pass with deficiencies,” or “fail.” Here’s what those results mean.

Pass: A rating of “pass” indicates that the firm’s quality control system is appropriately designed and compliant with professional standards.

Pass with Deficiencies: A rating of “pass with deficiencies” signifies that, except for the specific deficiencies described, the firm’s quality control system is appropriately designed and compliant with professional standards.

Fail: When a system review report receives a rating of “fail,” the reviewer has determined that as a result of significant deficiencies, the firm’s quality control system was not suitably designed or compliant with professional standards.

What to Look for in a Peer Review Report

  1. Verify that the report is recent (within the last three years).
  2. Make sure the auditor has experience in GAS and/or single audits. This information can be found under the “Required Selections and Considerations” section of the report.
  3. Ideally, you want your auditor’s peer review report to have a rating of “pass.”
  4. If the rating is “pass with deficiencies” or “fail,” are the deficiencies related to GAS or single audits? If the answer is yes, you’ll want to go with another auditor.

Choosing an Auditor You Can Trust

When it comes to hiring a CPA firm, reputation matters. Peer reviews are important not only for monitoring the quality of service and compliance of accounting firms, but also for protecting the public interest. RBT CPAs has participated in the peer review program for over 30 years, only ever receiving “pass” reports. When you work with RBT, you can be confident you are working with highly experienced accounting professionals, with a reputation for integrity and excellence. Give us a call today to learn more about our accounting, tax, audit, and advisory services—and find out how we can be Remarkably Better Together.

New York Allocates $13.5 Million for Distraction-Free Schools

New York Allocates $13.5 Million for Distraction-Free Schools

It’s that time of year again—school has started back up in New York. And with the new school year comes new state mandates, including a major policy change—no more smartphones in schools.

Beginning with the 2025-2026 school year, all New York public schools are required to implement distraction-free school policies. These policies must prohibit the use of non-school-issued internet-enabled devices during the entire school day (“bell to bell”) on school grounds. Such devices include, but are not limited to, cellphones, smartwatches, and tablets. The law applies to all public school districts, BOCES, and charter schools serving students in grades 7-12.

The policy includes certain exemptions to cellphone restrictions, such as when a cellphone is needed to manage a students’ healthcare needs (i.e., monitoring insulin levels), for an educational purpose authorized by a teacher or principal, for translation services, for use by a student in family caregiving, in the event of an emergency, and when included in a student’s IEP or Section 504 plan.

New York is the largest state to enact a statewide bell-to-bell smartphone restriction policy.

Policy Requirements

The law mandates that schools develop and implement distraction-free policies, beginning with the 2025-26 school year. Districts were required to adopt a policy by August 1, 2025. Local stakeholders, including teachers, parents, and students, must be consulted in the development of the policy. Policies must include a plan for storing devices and a method by which parents can contact their children during the school day. Schools can choose which storage solutions work best for their needs. The policy must be posted and accessible on the school’s website.

What funding is available for implementation?

Funding for policy implementation totals $13.5 million. Schools will be granted $10.90 per secondary student, based on 2023-2024 school year enrollment. These funds must be used exclusively to support distraction-free learning policies.

According to NYSED, allowable uses of funds include:

  • Device storage, such as lockers, lockable pouches, and centralized secure storage.
  • Policy development, including policy drafting and stakeholder consultation.
  • Professional development to train staff on policy implementation and enforcement.
  • Family and student outreach, including communicating and translating the policy.
  • Student education to teach responsible device use.
  • Other implementation costs (must be documented).

Why was the law passed?

The goal of a bell-to-bell distraction-free learning environment, according to the NYSUT Bell-to-Bell Local President Toolkit, is “to create a space where students can think critically, stay present, and build strong academic and social-emotional skills free from the pull of notifications or social media.”

Reasons for the law’s enactment include the following:

  • To remove the influence of digital distractions during the school day.
  • To encourage students to engage meaningfully with learning and with their peers.
  • To protect youth mental health and support student wellbeing.
  • To enhance educational outcomes.

What are the benefits of distraction-free learning?

According to NYSUT’s Bell-to-Bell Toolkit, the benefits of distraction-free learning include:

  • Academic benefits: improved student focus, engagement, test scores, and academic performance, and more efficient use of instructional time.
  • Social-emotional benefits: improved socialization in lunchrooms and hallways, stronger communication skills, decreased social anxiety, and reduced cyberbullying.
  • Instructional benefits: fewer discipline referrals and fewer bathroom requests to check phones.
  • Mental health benefits: decreased stress and anxiety, less social media-related drama, reduced bullying, and fewer visits to school counselors for mental health.
  • Benefits for educators: improved staff morale and job satisfaction, more instructional time, and more meaningful interactions with students.

Many school districts that implemented distraction-free policies prior to the statewide mandate have already noticed positive impacts, including increased focus and classroom engagement, improved student interactions, decreased burden on teachers, a reduction in fights and suspensions, and improved test scores.

How We Can Help

While you focus on keeping your district distraction-free and navigating the state’s new mandates, remember that RBT CPAs is here to support all of your district’s accounting, tax, audit, and advisory needs. Call us today to find out how we can be Remarkably Better Together.

Are You Classifying Your Workers Correctly?

Are You Classifying Your Workers Correctly?

In general, workers in the construction industry fall into one of two categories: employees or independent contractors. Under the FSLA, workers designated as employees are entitled to certain rights such as minimum wage and overtime pay. Misclassification of workers is an ongoing issue in the industry. In some cases, this misclassification is intentional—such as when employers hoping to save money or gain a competitive advantage wrongly classify employees as independent contractors. In other cases, misclassification is the result of oversight. Whether intentional or not, incorrect classification of workers has consequences for both employees and employers alike. It is critical that contractors classify workers correctly to both protect employee rights and avoid significant penalties themselves.

What happens when workers are misclassified?

Beyond creating unfair competition in the industry, the misclassification of workers can negatively impact employees and also have serious consequences for employers.

Impact on Employees

Employees misclassified as independent contractors may be denied minimum wage, overtime pay, and other FSLA-protected rights. Those involved in public works projects might also be denied prevailing wage—a violation of prevailing wage laws. Misclassified workers can also face unfair tax burdens when classified as independent contractors, as they become solely responsible for paying taxes typically shared between an employer and employee (i.e. Social Security and Medicare taxes).

Consequences for Employers (Contractors)

When an employee is misclassified, the contractor is responsible for paying any unpaid wages and benefits owed to the employee, including employer taxes such as federal and state unemployment and workers’ compensation. The contractor may also face civil and criminal penalties (up to $2,500 for the first violation and $5,000 for repeat violations per employee), as well as related legal fees. Fines on federal and state withholding taxes not withheld and paid could be as high as 100% of the tax owed. Other risks include potential lawsuits and civil liability. In severe cases, contractors may even face criminal prosecution and temporary debarment from public works jobs.

What is the law?

Last year, in response to the ongoing issue of misclassification, the U.S. Department of Labor passed a final rule revising guidance on classifying employees versus independent contractors under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). This final rule, effective as of March 11, 2024, rescinded the 2021 Independent Contractor Status Under the Fair Labor Standards Act rule. The 2024 final rule applies to all employers subject to the FLSA.

Under the FLSA, workers are considered employees if they are economically dependent on the employer for work. Alternatively, workers are considered independent contractors if they are in business for themselves.

According to the DOL’s Fact Sheet 13, a worker’s classification depends on the “economic realities” of the relationship between the worker and the employer. To assess these economic realities, contractors must consider all of the following six factors:

  1. Opportunity for profit or loss depending on managerial skill: Does the worker experience profits or losses as a result of their own decisions and efforts?
  2. Investments by the worker and the potential employer: Does the worker make capital or entrepreneurial investments?
  3. Degree of permanence of the work relationship: What is the nature and duration of the work relationship?
  4. Nature and degree of control: How much control does the employer have over the performance of the work and the economic aspects of the relationship?
  5. Extent to which the work performed is an integral part of the employer’s business: Is the work critical to the employer’s principal business?
  6. Skill and initiative: Does the worker use their own specialized skills to perform the work and support the business?

If the economic realities of the relationship prove that the worker is economically dependent on the contractor for work, that worker is considered an employee.

What else do you need to know when classifying workers?

  • A person’s title or label at work is not relevant in determining status as an employee or independent contractor.
  • Factors such as where the work was performed, when and how the worker was paid, and whether the worker is licensed by state or local government do not determine worker classification.
  • A worker cannot choose to waive employee status and be classified as an independent contractor.
  • According to the Wage and Hour Division, a worker may be an employee even if the worker agrees to be paid off the books, receives a 1099 tax form, signs an independent contractor agreement, is registered as an independent contractor or other business entity under state law, or agrees with the employer on independent contractor status.

Conclusion

It is important that contractors familiarize themselves with the guidelines for worker classification to prevent potential repercussions. Classifying your workers correctly is key to protecting worker rights and avoiding negative consequences for your business. For additional details and guidance, visit the DOL’s Frequently Asked Questions page, Small Entity Compliance Guide, and Fact Sheet 13.